TJIIRRS, Report Number 15D:

Toward a Straightforward DIY Flashlamp-Pumped Organic Dye Laser
Step 4: Truly High Voltage

(February 8, 2010, ff)

This page details what I hope is almost the final step toward a DIY flashlamp-pumped dye laser that stores a very modest amount of energy at extremely high voltage, and involves a minimum of expensive commercial components. This design stage involves building capacitors that can handle 60 kV, and will have (I hope) reasonably low effective series inductance (ESL).



!! CAUTION !!

This laser uses very high voltages, and capacitors that can store lethal amounts of energy. It puts out a laser beam that can damage your eyes and skin, and it uses organic dyes, some of which are known to be quite toxic. It also uses flammable organic solvents.

In some of its configurations it uses spark gaps that generate powerful acoustical pulses when the laser is cycled; these pulses can (and will!) damage your hearing if you do not use adequate protective gear. (The earmuffs used by shooters should be sufficient; foam earplugs may or may not be.)

It is important to take adequate safety precautions and use appropriate safety equipment with any laser; but it is crucially important with lasers that involve high voltages and present a health and/or fire hazard!



1: Overview

(08 February, 2010)

The previous version of this laser, or at least of its flashlamp driver, used a single-stage Marx generator and a single isolation gap. I expect this version to use a single capacitor or an array of capacitors connected in parallel, and a single spark gap for switching. The gap will probably free-run initially, but I hope that eventually I will be able to build a triggered one. If the capacitor does not discharge rapidly enough I will be obliged to add a “peaker” capacitor. The peaker, if it is required, will almost certainly use a liquid dielectric.

(19 February, 2010)

Here is a schematic:

The schematic shows a triggered spark gap, but as I mention above I will initially use a free-running one. It also shows the negative side of the power supply grounded, but I may not bother; it depends on how the driver behaves when it floats.

(08 February, 2010)

Powering a laser of this type with an electrostatic generator presents an interesting challenge. Instead of 20,000 Volts, we could now be dealing with as much as perhaps 100,000. Generators are rated in microamps rather than milliamps, and corona losses interfere with our ability to generate and store the amounts of energy we require. Dielectrics must be thick in order to withstand the supply voltages, and terminals must be separated by larger distances, both of which increase the ESL of the capacitors. OTOH, at 60 kV it takes only about 7 nf to store 12 Joules, which should help a bit with discharge speed, and at 75 kV, the required capacitance is even smaller.



2: Capacitor Design and Construction

(08 February, 2010)

At this point, I am still thinking about ways to build suitable capacitors. There are several more-or-less standard methods, all of which seem bulky, ungainly, and suboptimal. A stack of glass plates, one obvious method, is also rather heavy. Large amounts of PVC pipe would be quite expensive.

Although it is at the limit of DIY capability, I am beginning to think about TiO2 powder with a calcium boroaluminosilicate glass binder. This material can, if appropriately processed, have dielectric constant about equal to that of water and dielectric strength of about 1200V/mil, which would be viable. The real questions are whether ordinary TiO2 powder (which I already have) will work; whether I can come up with an appropriate glass (the composition is not fully specified in the one reference I’ve been able to find so far) and whether I can actually make sheets of the material that are suitable for use in real-world capacitors. For use at 60 kV they would have to be about 1/8" thick (figure that some headroom on the voltage is necessary, and that the dielectric strength goes down as the thickness increases), and for 7 nf the capacitor plates would have to be about 7" square, or about 8" diameter if circular.

Frankly, despite all of the caveats and issues, that’s considerably better than anything else I’ve come up with so far, ...if I can bring it off at all.

(10 February, 2010, late evening, with notes added later)

A day or two back I calculated the capacitance of a Leyden jar made from a 5-gallon plastic bucket. My assumptions and guesses were as follows:

  1. The bucket is made of polypropylene or some similar material, with dielectric constant of roughly 2.3. [[This is correct, though the material is actually HDPE.]]

  2. The plastic is about 1/8" thick. (It may actually be slightly thinner.)

  3. It will withstand at least 500 V/mil at that thickness. [[Again, approximately accurate.]]

  4. The bucket is a cylinder (not true), 10.75" in diameter. (Also, of course, not true. Actual 5-gallon buckets are larger at the top than the bottom, so they don’t have a single defined diameter.) The one I just measured is about 11.5" across at the top, and about 10.25" across at the bottom. The height, from base to just under the lowest lip, is about 11.25".

The area of the “cylinder” is about 380 square inches, and the area of the bottom is about 82.5 square inches. That gives us total area of about 462.5 square inches. Coupled with the other information this gives us capacitance of 1906 pf, which we will call 1.9 nf as the starting data were not accurate enough to warrant more than 1 decimal place.

At 60 kV this stores about 3.4 J, so we would need at least 3 of the things. The obvious problem is that the large physical size essentially guarantees somewhat higher ESL than we would like. OTOH, a 5-gallon bucket costs very little, and the notion is fairly attractive for that reason. Mind you, other components would be required; conductive paint is not cheap, and it would almost certainly be necessary to plate copper onto the initial coating in order to get a thick enough conductive layer. Also, some kind of insulating rim would be necessary, just under the lowest lip of each bucket, to help minimize the corona losses. This would have to be made from a piece of plastic sheet, which introduces additional expense. Still, it is very DIY, and that’s good. I think I even have an idea about how to make decent connections to the plates.

(15 February, 2010, late evening, and 16 February, afternoon)

Jarrod Kinsey has gotten sparks more than 8" long with a Leyden jar made from a 5-gallon bucket, so I think we will try for ~75 kV, and I have acquired 2 buckets. My reasoning is as follows: I am currently using 15 nf. I am seeing risetimes on the order of 80 nsec, and the initial peak (the pulses are slightly underdamped) looks to me like it is roughly 250 nsec across, FWHM. This corresponds reasonably well to system inductance of about 400 nh. If I use 2 buckets, each of which is close to 2 nf, the capacitance will be only 1/4 of what it is now. This means that I should be able to tolerate system inductance of about 1600 nh without much change in the risetime or pulsewidth.

At 75 kV, the two buckets together will have capacitance of ~3.8 nf, and will store a little more than 10.5 J. If the system inductance is even as high as, say, 1200 nh, triple what it is now, that should still be enough energy to provide adequate peak power in the flashlamp ...if the discharge is not particularly underdamped. It remains to be seen whether I can achieve critical damping.

As a preliminary check, I dropped a 2nf 50kV capacitor directly onto the Wimshurst, and took a scope trace of the resulting spark. This was difficult, because the Wim generated a large amount of electrical interference, but I did eventually get a few traces recorded. Here is the best of them:

There are some interesting features to be noted here. First, the risetime is only a little bit more than 50 nsec. That’s pretty decent. Second, the system at least looks like it is grossly underdamped — there are at least 7 peaks visible in the trace. (See below.) My hope is that this will be less of an issue when I am using a better spark gap and there is a flashlamp in the circuit. The result is quite encouraging, despite the underdamping.

(Just by the bye: if we assume that the initial peak is a fairly clean half-sine about 100 nsec across, and we ignore the capacitances of the two small Leyden jars that are built into the generator, this performance corresponds to system inductance of slightly less than 600 nh. That’s fairly encouraging.)

(18 February, 2010, early am)

I put a flashlamp across the Wimshurst, along with the 2 nf capacitor, and left a small gap so there would be a slightly higher charge voltage before the lamp actually lit up. Here is the result:

Superficially, this looks a lot like the previous one, but as you begin to look more closely you discover a key difference: the horizontal sweep is at 100 nsec per division, not 50. I now think that the smallish “wiggles”, of which there are 13 or 14 visible here, have something to do with the Leyden jars that are built into the generator, and are not actually multiple pulses of the lamp.

The risetime is roughly 100 nsec, and the FWHM pulsewidth appears to be between 350 and 400 nsec. (The peak is so badly obscured by noise that I am not sure of the actual height, which makes it difficult to decide where the half-height is.) If this were actually at 75 kV or so, and if the capacitor were 4 nf instead of 2, it might even be viable. That is, I take it as a good sign. Still, it is very artificial, and it does not represent the expected conditions very well.

To get back on track:

You can make an ordinary Leyden jar by gluing aluminum foil around a bucket, inside and out. This is easy, and it does work, but there are some issues. Anyplace where there is air trapped under the foil, you are losing capacitance. In addition, as you use the capacitor the trapped air ionizes, and eventually it damages the dielectric under it. When the damage gets bad enough, the capacitor fails. Also, although it is certainly possible to make good electrical contact to aluminum foil, it is perhaps not the easiest thing in the world.

I thought about that, and decided that I should use a conductive liquid instead. My first thought was copper sulfate, which I already know has been used in some high-voltage resistors, and which should be compatible with brass shim stock. Reading up on conductive liquids of common sorts, though, I found that ammonium chloride has 5X better conductivity. Granted, it is necessary to use stainless steel shim stock, but that is readily available. Ammonium chloride has other advantages: for one thing it is relatively nontoxic, and has been used in cosmetic and food products. In addition, it is available and not terribly expensive.

My current thinking is that I will wrap the shim stock closely around the buckets, and that the liquid will fill any spaces that would otherwise be air pockets. I think I know how to make connections to the inside conductors as well as the outside ones, and I think I have an idea about how to keep the terminals isolated from each other. Lisa Peoples, our Range Safety Officer, has suggested standing the buckets in a plastic tub, which is good for several reasons, one of which is that tubs of the required size (about 12 x 24", and about 11 or 12" high at the rim) are readily available.

I have ammonium chloride and some shim stock on order, and we’ll see what happens when I try to put all of this into practice.

More as it happens...



Back to the first page of this set, which covers the initial design and development of the laser.

Back to the second page of this set, which covers the first set of refinements.

Back to the Index

Home



This work is supported by
the Joss Research Institute
19 Main Street
Laurel  MD  20707-4303  USA



Contact Information:

My email address is a@b.com, where a is my first name (jon, only 3 letters, no “h”), and b is joss.

My phone number is +1 240 604 4495.

Last modified: Thu Jun 23 15:55:48 CDT 2016